HELENA, Mont. (AP) 鈥� A Montana law for transgender minors will remain temporarily blocked, the state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday, after justices agreed with a lower court judge who found the law is likely unconstitutional.
The case against the Montana law now goes to trial before District Court Judge Jason Marks in Missoula. The U.S. Supreme Court on the issue, as well, after the Biden administration sought to block bans in more than half the states.
Legislative debate over Montana鈥檚 bill drew after Republicans punished Democratic Rep. Zooey Zephyr 鈥� the first transgender woman elected to the state鈥檚 Legislature 鈥� for .
Marks in late September 2023, just days before it was to take effect. He , their families and health care providers that the law is likely unconstitutional and would harm the mental and physical health of minors with gender dysphoria, rather than protect them from experimental treatments, as supporters said it would.
The judge noted the same Republican-controlled Legislature passed a law saying patients, including minors, have a right to receive treatment with experimental drugs 鈥� as long as it's recommended by a health care provider and they give consent.
Marks said he could only conclude the Legislature's stated intent in passing the law was 鈥渄isingenuous鈥� and it seemed more likely its purpose is to 鈥渂an an outcome deemed undesirable by the Montana Legislature, veiled as protection for minors."
The law sought to prohibit the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgical treatments for gender dysphoria. However, cisgender minors would still be able to receive puberty blockers to treat early puberty or surgical procedures to treat intersex conditions, the plaintiffs argued.
Montana is one of at least 26 states that have passed bans on gender-affirming medical care for minors and Some bans have been temporarily blocked by courts, while others have been allowed to take effect. Fifteen states have enacted protections for gender-affirming medical care for minors.
In Montana鈥檚 case, transgender youth argued the law would ban them from continuing to receive gender-affirming medical care, violating their constitutional rights to equal protection, the right to seek health care and the right to dignity.
Amy Beth Hanson, The Associated Press
