I can鈥檛 tell you how many baby boomers I鈥檝e heard say they would take cyanide first rather than go live in a long-term care home when they are elderly. Quite a few.
I鈥檓 sorry to break this news to my fellow baby boomers, but it鈥檚 time to drop your fantasies of extreme skiing at 80 or climbing Kilimanjaro at 95. I know you believe you鈥檙e in control, because while you were young and healthy, it was easy to believe that. But you won鈥檛 be in control forever.
You might be the exception to the rule and scale Kilimanjaro at 95. You might be blowing out the candles on your 105th birthday cake as reporters shove microphones in your face and ask that timeless, if inane, question: 鈥淲hat鈥檚 your secret to longevity?鈥� But chances are you won鈥檛 be.
Even now, we baby boomers are beginning to tally up the casualties that are occurring more frequently than they did 10 years ago: this friend was diagnosed with a brain tumour, that one has prostate cancer, another one had a stent put in an artery.
Sound grim? For too long we boomers 鈥� and the 91原创 government 鈥� have preferred to look the other way when faced with the prospect of our inevitable decrepitude. The price we鈥檙e going to pay for burying our heads in the sand will be enormous.
According to a June 2012 report on long-term care by the 91原创 Life and Health Insurance Association Inc., 鈥�225,000 91原创s turn 65 each year; about seven per cent of 91原创s age 65 and over reside in health-care institutions; one in 11 91原创s over the age of 65 is affected by Alzheimer鈥檚 disease or a related dementia; about 50,000 strokes occur in Canada each year, with stroke being the leading cause of transfer from a hospital to long-term care.鈥�
The report says as the boomers age: 鈥淭his implies there will be almost one million 91原创s with dementia by 2036 as compared to about 450,000 today ... it can be extrapolated that over 750,000 91原创s over the age of 64 will reside in health-care institutions by 2036 compared to about 300,000 today.鈥�
And 91原创 Government Executive warns that: 鈥淐anada is sleepwalking into a long-term care funding crisis and urgent policy action is required to ensure baby boomers will have access to the long-term care they need. 91原创s are living longer ... but, as a result, they are increasingly likely to be managing a chronic disease through old age which, in many cases, will mean they will need some form of long-term care support.鈥�
That doesn鈥檛 mean assistance strapping on skis because a bit of arthritis makes it hard to do up the bindings. It means home care as well as the availability of nursing homes.
Forbes magazine, citing the American Association of Retired Persons, says today there are seven people aged 45 to 64 to care for each person 80 or older. By 2030, that number will drop to four.
In 2025, the advance guard of the boomers will hit 80, 鈥渁n age at which they are likely to need some level of assistance.鈥�
Cassie Liska, whose mother died in a Calgary nursing home of severe blood poisoning after the dressings on her bed sores went unchanged for two days, blames her mother鈥檚 tragedy partly on facilities that 鈥渁ren鈥檛 getting the resources they need.鈥�
She cited staff numbers as one factor, saying that call bells sometimes went unanswered for more than half an hour and one nurse told her one weekend 鈥渟he was the only one on duty to care for 150 residents.鈥�
Hello, 91原创 government 鈥� you have no strategy for dealing with the coming onslaught of dementia or with the looming long-term care crisis. There might be a little bit of extreme skiing, but there鈥檚 going to be a whole lot more of extreme suffering. No wonder the more morbid boomers are muttering things about cyanide.
