There is nothing like an election to bring out the optimistic side in people 鈥� and some mythmaking. In Quebec, recent attention focused on Premier Pauline Marois and her musings that if her party wins the provincial election, and if separation one day occurs, Quebec would keep the 91原创 dollar, seek a seat on the Bank of Canada and provide dual citizenship for Qu茅b茅cois.
Some of the Marois musings could theoretically occur, though much is in the realm of fantasy. But here鈥檚 a myth relevant to any musings about possible separation and one often promulgated by Quebec elites: That Quebec is not subsidized by the rest of Canada.
Over the years, former Bloc Qu茅b茅cois leader Gilles Duceppe promulgated this notion, as did former Quebec finance minister Raymond Bachand under the last Liberal government. Both argued with a straight face that Quebec was not subsidized.
A modified version of this claim was resurrected again by a Quebec-based think tank this month. In a short paper, the Institut de recherche et d鈥檌nformations socio-茅conomique claimed that Quebec isn鈥檛 all that dependent on the rest of Canada and pointed to how the Maritimes are comparatively more dependent. And anyway, it added, depending on the year, equalization payments from the federal government to Ottawa account for just three to six per cent of Quebec government spending.
Let鈥檚 be clear about these Quebec claims: Taxpayers in every province pay federal taxes, but that doesn鈥檛 mean certain provinces are not subsidized by taxpayers in another. It matters where federal taxes originate and where they are later spent, on a net basis.
Statistics Canada data, when averaged out between 2000 and 2009, give an idea of how dependent a province is (or is not) on federal transfers.
The data include, for instance, transfers to provincial governments, payments to individuals (think employment insurance) and other big-ticket expenses such as federal infrastructure spending.
The numbers are not beyond some criticism: If the federal government pays a head office in Montreal for a product actually manufactured in Ontario, the federal spending in reality benefits Ontario.
Such occasional wrinkles aside, though, the data show that, as a percentage of GDP, taxpayers in three provinces contribute more in revenues than is later spent by the federal government: Albertans contribute more (by 6.1 percentage points), Ontarians contribute more (by 3.8 points) and British Columbians contribute more (by 1.7 points).
The other seven provinces were all net 鈥渢akers鈥� from the federal purse. On average, federal spending was two percentage points of GDP higher than federal revenue in Quebec; in Prince Edward Island, federal spending was almost 20 percentage points higher.
None of this is surprising or necessarily unfair, at least in some specific cases. You would expect, for example, the federal government to spend less per person in Alberta on employment insurance than in Nova Scotia, as Alberta has a lower unemployment rate.
In dollar terms, the 2000 to 2009 average shows that Albertans lost the most, with a net loss of $3,852 per person annually in the federal taxing/spending equation. (British Columbians lose $666 per person and the figure in Ontario is $1,548.) Qu茅b茅cois are net gainers, with $730 per person, while P.E.I. won the lottery, with $5,838 in federal spending per person.
So P.E.I. is indeed more dependent on federal transfers than Quebec when measured per person. And the $730-per-person balance in Quebec鈥檚 favour might not seem like much, but in 2009, P.E.I. had just 140,000 people; Quebec had more than 7.8 million.
In 2009, those population figures mean a $5.7-billion net federal transfer to Quebec. (In contrast, P.E.I.鈥檚 net transfers cost the rest of Canada $817 million.) That was equivalent to 42 per cent of the amount of revenues from Quebec鈥檚 consumption taxes ($13.5 billion) and almost as much as Quebec paid in interest on its debt that year ($6.2 billion).
That raises the question of how an independent Quebec would pay for any revenue loss. Last time I checked, Quebec was not undertaxed. Regardless, no one, least of all anyone in Quebec, should buy the myth Quebec isn鈥檛 massively subsidized by the rest of Canada. It surely is.
听
Mark Milke is a senior fellow with the Fraser Institute.
听
