I have reviewed the letters to the editor published in the Times 91原创 over the past 10 months to learn that an overwhelming majority appear to be against the changes to Beacon Hill Park roads - a far cry from the figures released by the city indicating strong support for their plan.
I sincerely hope that council rejects the changes to Beacon Hill Park for many of the reasons already expressed and upholds the conviction that citizens deserve answers. For example, were any options earnestly explored that would allow for the continuation of the park's existing road network? Also, has approval been sought for changes to this designated heritage site containing historically significant First Nations burial cairns?
It's outrageous that little action has been taken to address concerns. Remedies could include speed bumps, signage, radar, ticketing vehicles for traffic and bylaw infractions, with the possibility of banning through traffic during peak hours and special events. Reducing free-parking time limits and implementing metered parking for longer periods could also be considered.
I anticipate that residents living on streets bordering the park will see traffic increase as visitors circumnavigate the park to enter from Southgate Street if these changes occur. As for the city's hypocritical references to "cut-through" traffic, I would respectfully say that, other than some reported morning and evening commuters, the majority of people are more likely enjoying an outing in our beautiful City of Gardens that includes a drive through the park - as my family has been doing for six generations.
Steve Venables
Victoria
