Earlier this month, auditor general John Doyle picked up the newspaper and saw his job advertised in it, which is usually a bad sign.
On Wednesday, the B.C. Liberals capitulated, gave up their secret plan to oust him and offered him two more years in the post. But there鈥檚 still some uncertainty about whether the climbdown represents the end of the story.
The Liberal MLAs responsible for this project released an official version of the story Wednesday that has a hole in it. Maybe that鈥檚 why they did it as quietly as possible under the circumstances, posting a report to an obscure corner of a legislature website.
It said the all-party committee was charged with appointing an auditor general and met four times last year. When Doyle notified them he was interested in serving a second term, they interviewed him, then 鈥渁greed to hold an open competition.鈥�
Under the rules, that means they rejected him.
The report says that they started advertising for a replacement on Jan. 5 and the ads 鈥減rompted considerable public interest.鈥�
That鈥檚 apparently code for 鈥渟tarted a firestorm of suspicion about our motives to the point where the premier had to step in to cool things down.鈥�
The official version says that in response, they met three times in the space of last week and then agreed to recommend Doyle鈥檚 re-appointment for a term ending Oct. 31, 2015.
The big question that鈥檚 left unanswered is why they changed their minds.
The obvious answer is that they were embarrassed into doing so. But you won鈥檛 find them admitting that.
Committee chairman Liberal MLA Eric Foster said the decision was made behind the wall of confidentiality that surrounds such committees. He wouldn鈥檛 even confirm that Premier Christy Clark鈥檚 intervention had anything to do with it.
In fact, the two of them have separate stories on that aspect of the controversy.
Clark last week promised a new bill next month that will end the awkward re-appointment process, by extending the term to eight years from six and making it non-renewable.
She expressed the hope that Doyle would be offered two more years in the meantime.
Said the premier: 鈥淚t鈥檚 my hope, and I鈥檝e communicated this to the B.C. Liberal members on the committee, that they will extend an offer to Mr. Doyle to complete his work and stay on for what would be the remaining two years of his term.鈥�
But Foster said Wednesday he didn鈥檛 talk to the premier personally about it.
鈥淚 have run into the premier two or three times over the last little while but no, we really didn鈥檛 discuss it, per se. She just commented one day, 鈥楰eep up the good work on the committee,鈥� and that was about it.鈥�
But there鈥檚 a much bigger question than how the Liberals鈥� retreat was organized:
What will Doyle make of it?
He clearly won a good part of the argument, with Wednesday鈥檚 news.
But what if he wants all of it? He offered to sign up for six more years, not two.
New Democrats on the committee are bound to secrecy just like the Liberals, so they can鈥檛 talk about the decision. But Opposition caucus chair Shane Simpson said he wasn鈥檛 assuming the story is over yet.
鈥淎t the end of the day, considering what he鈥檚 been through and how this exercise has played out, I wouldn鈥檛 presume anything,鈥� Simpson said.
He said the Opposition is glad the Liberals reversed themselves. 鈥淚t鈥檚 unfortunate we went through this mess and they had to clean it up 鈥� but here we are now, we have an offer on the table and we鈥檒l see what Mr. Doyle says.鈥�
Wednesday鈥檚 announcement shows that Doyle won another part of the argument, as well.
There鈥檚 been some dispute about the dates in the term. The legislature and the government said May was the operative date, because that鈥檚 when he was offered the job. But Doyle said it should be October, because that鈥檚 when he actually started.
Liberals seem to have accepted October now. That may give Doyle more time to consider whether to accept two years, or hold out for six.
