Prices for LED bulbs have dropped in the last year and quality has improved. Many models do a good job of mimicking the light and look of incandescent bulbs.
- - -
[Topic: LED light bulbs]
The first few rounds of energy efficient light bulbs gave them a really bad reputation. Those spiral ones 鈥� compact fluorescent lamps or CFLs 鈥� turned out to contain mercury, which is toxic if it leaks out of a broken bulb. They glowed with a sickly harsh hue. They were dim when first turned on, taking several minutes to come to full brightness. They didn鈥檛 like the cold. They burned out much faster than advertised; in my experience many lasted only as long as incandescents. When a couple of ours burned out prematurely, the glass spiral and the base turned an alarming grey and there was a slight odour. On top of all that, they hummed as they got older. Definitely not a good beginning for what was supposed to be a new, energy-saving era in lighting. Those spiral bulbs, I鈥檓 told, are better now. But after such a bad introduction, I鈥檓 reluctant to give them another try.
For a time, when the CFLs burned out, I switched back to incandescents. But I鈥檓 now moving to LED bulbs.
In the last year, LED bulbs have become an acceptable alternative, based on price and performance. The quality of the light, the most important thing, is pretty much on par with the beloved but highly inefficient incandescent; that鈥檚 especially true with LED bulbs that are rated as 鈥渨arm鈥� in the colour spectrum. Many LED bulb designs mimic the shape and colour of incandescents, so they don鈥檛 look weird in light fixtures.
Price has been a major barrier for LED bulbs. A couple of years ago, they were $40 and up per bulb. But in the last year, prices have dropped a lot. I鈥檝e found LED bulbs at around $13 for a 6-watt unit, which is a replacement for a 40-watt incandescent, and $16 for a 9.5-watt, a replacement for a 60-watt incandescent. That鈥檚 still a lot of money, compared with around 75 cents for an incandescent. In theory, you will recover the difference, and more, by using significantly less energy, and by not having to repeatedly replace the bulbs. Some manufacturers are guaranteeing a 10-year-life for LEDs, based on 鈥渢ypical鈥� usage.
The standard claims for LED bulbs are that they last 25 times as long as incandescents, and they use about 80 per cent less energy. That can translate into around $100 in energy savings during an LED bulb鈥檚 25,000-hour lifespan.
LEDs turn on instantly, are dimmable, are supposed to work fine in the cold (I have not tested), do not make noise, do not contain mercury. They also use less energy than CFLs to provide the same illumination.
I can鈥檛 attest to the lifespan claims yet. The longest service for an LED bulb in our house is about a year at a high-use location in our kitchen where an incandescent would burn out roughly every six months.
- - -
Ballpark costs: $13 to $16 听for a 40-watt equivalent LED bulb, $3 to $6 for a CFL, 50 to 75 cents for an incandescent.
- - -
Update: The U.S. website the best LED light bulb. It's available from Home Depot.
- - -
Compact fluorescent bulbs are defended.
- - -
He said his CFLs all failed within 12 months and points out that they are banned from the trash; when they die, they must go on an energy-wasting trip to an approved recycling depot.
- - -
comparing the characteristics of LED, CFL and incandescent bulbs. LEDs are the clear winner in their view.
- - -
They are much more positive about CFLs than I am.
- - -
Federal government edicts are changing what bulbs can be sold; generally, the idea is to phase out less efficient bulbs.
Here are explanations from Natural Resources Canada, which I admit to not fully understanding.
- - -
听
- - -
听
Most popular posts:
听
听
听
听
- - -
