Last week, the Supreme Court delivered another blow to beleaguered pensioners, ruling that 91原创 law prioritizes bankers and hedge funds over retired people facing drastic reductions in their incomes.
In a five-to-two decision, the Supreme Court of Canada rejected an Ontario Court of Appeal decision that gave an underfunded pension plan first dibs on money from assets sold during bankruptcy restructuring.
In 2009, Indalex Limited sought Companies鈥� Creditors Arrangement Act protection, and as a result, 170听of its former employees saw their pensions slashed in half. But two years later, the Ontario court ruled that the firm, which administrated the pension plan, broke its fiduciary responsibility to the pensioners. Indalex failed to keep retirees鈥� pension plans fully funded or to give proper notice that they were going under. The Ontario court granted the pensioners $6.75 million in assets sold during bankruptcy restructuring, which the 91原创 subsidiary had planned to send to its U.S. parent company to pay back last-ditch 鈥渄ebtor-in-possession鈥� loans.
In overturning the lower court鈥檚 decision, the Supreme Court agreed (unanimously) that Indalex breached its fiduciary responsibility to the pensioners. Nonetheless, the highest court ruled that the provincial pension law under which the Ontario court applied its ruling was overriden by federal CCAA rules, which provide a super-priority to 鈥渄ebtor-in-possession鈥� financing whereby banks and hedge funds lend to distressed companies.
The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision is of significant import. Over the past few years, tens of thousands of 91原创 retirees have seen their pensions wiped out during bankruptcy proceedings.
Bankruptcy laws that prioritize wealthy creditors over pensioners are fundamentally unjust. It鈥檚 time to amend CCAA rules so employees鈥� pensions are considered deferred wages, which have priority status over other creditors.
But reforming CCAA rules to better protect pensioners during bankruptcy hearings is a half-measure. These changes should be accompanied by efforts to lessen the risk inherent in employer-run pension plans.
The best way to do this is by expanding Canada Pension Plan coverage. CPP has proven to be highly secure, as risk is distributed over a huge pool of contributors and the plan is backed by the government. It also has far lower administrative fees than most private pension plans, and CPP is portable across provinces and jobs.
The 91原创 Labour Congress has called for doubling CPP benefits by gradually increasing, over a seven-year period, workers鈥� and employers鈥� contributions to 7.7 per cent of wages. This would bring the maximum CPP benefit to approximately $20,000 per year when fully phased-in.
The Supreme Court鈥檚 recent decision is a blow to pensioners. But there is a silver lining. In its ruling, the high court noted: 鈥淭here are good reasons for giving special protection to members of pension plans in insolvency proceedings.鈥� But the Supreme Court said it鈥檚 Parliament, not the courts, that should determine where pensions rank in a restructuring.
Stephen Harper, are you listening?
听
Dave Coles is the national president of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union.
