This article was originally published on The Conversation, an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. Disclosure information is available on the original site.
___
Authors: Noella Gray, Associate Professor of Geography, University of Guelph and Victoria Hodson, PhD Student, University of Guelph
In the early hours of Dec. 19 鈥� the last day of the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) conference in Montr茅al 鈥� the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) adopted their new post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.聽
The goals and targets agreed within this framework, including the widely discussed Target 3, will guide conservation policy and investment for years to come. Target 3 鈥� also known as the 鈥�30x30鈥� target 鈥� calls for the conservation of 30 per cent of global land and sea areas by 2030.聽
The CBD has long promoted the creation of protected areas (parks) for the protection of both terrestrial and marine environments. The 鈥�30x30鈥� target is a significant increase from the Aichi targets, set during the COP10 conference in Aichi Prefecture, Japan, which called for 17 per cent terrestrial and 10 per cent marine areas to be protected by 2020.
As researchers who study conservation governance, we have closely followed the four years of negotiations that led to this historic agreement. We believe that as protected and conserved areas increase under the framework, an equity-based approach, which respects Indigenous rights and title, is essential to help bring the transformative changes we need to halt and reverse biodiversity loss.聽
Challenges of 鈥�30x30鈥�
In 2019, scientists called for a global deal for nature to save biodiversity, including a minimum of 30 per cent of Earth to be formally protected. The High Ambition Coalition 鈥� a group of more than 100 countries including Canada 鈥� has advocated for the 鈥�30x30鈥� target since its launch in January 2021.聽
Such area-based targets, however, raise concerns. Protected areas have perpetuated colonial ideologies and violated Indigenous rights.聽
Some international organizations, like Survival International, campaigned against 鈥�30x30,鈥� fearing that it would lead to further land grabs, human rights violations and dispossession of Indigenous Peoples globally, such as the recent eviction of the Maasai from the Ngorongoro Nature Reserve in Tanzania.聽
At COP15, many countries insisted that the ambitious 鈥�30x30鈥� target must be matched by similarly ambitious funding. The Democratic Republic of the Congo initially rejected the framework on Monday, arguing that promised financial transfers from developed to developing countries were still insufficient. Although Congo later agreed to the framework, the tension during the meeting was high. The delegate from Namibia summarized it saying colonial injustice underlies all problems encountered in the CBD.
These concerns 鈥� regarding colonialism, global injustice and human rights violations 鈥� informed the negotiations of the Framework at COP15.聽
One sticking point was whether Indigenous and traditional territories should be included in Target 3 as a distinct category of conservation, separate from protected areas. The International Indigenous Forum on Biodiversity argued that incorporating Indigenous and traditional territories into existing conservation policies, like government-led protected areas, undermines Indigenous self-determination.聽
Ultimately, the final framework fell short of recognizing Indigenous territories as a distinct category of protection.聽
Some organizations are concerned this will put Indigenous Peoples at greater risk of human rights violations, while others welcomed the strong language in the framework regarding respect for the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities.聽
Canada鈥檚 role in 鈥�30x30鈥�
Despite the concerns raised, the Global Biodiversity Framework creates opportunities to further Indigenous-led conservation. For example, following international guidelines, the creation and management of Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs) can count towards the 30 per cent target.聽
According to the Indigenous Circle of Experts, IPCAs are Indigenous-led, represent a long-term commitment to conservation and elevate Indigenous rights and responsibilities.
In Canada, there is growing recognition of the role of IPCAs in meeting conservation goals while also supporting reconciliation efforts. In August 2021, for example, the Government of Canada announced an investment of up to $340 million in new funding over five years to support Indigenous leadership in nature conservation. Over $166 million of this will be dedicated to supporting IPCAs.聽
During the opening ceremony of COP15, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced funding of up to $800 million to support Indigenous-led conservation initiatives over seven years. Later in the summit, Minister of Environment and Climate Change, Steven Guilbeault, jointly announced a new First Nations National Guardians Network with Val茅rie Courtois, the Director of the Indigenous Leadership Initiative.聽
The federal, provincial, territorial and Indigenous governments have also announced work towards establishing new IPCAs, including one in the Seal River Watershed in Manitoba and another one around Great Bear Lake (Ts谩 Tu茅) in the Northwest Territories.聽
These investments demonstrate a growing recognition that Indigenous-led stewardship has equal or better conservation outcomes than government-led conservation efforts. It also shows the need for innovative forms of conservation governance beyond traditional protected areas. IPCAs present an important opportunity for transformative change, where Indigenous Peoples鈥� rights and responsibilities are upheld, rather than undermined, while working toward global conservation goals.
Beyond COP15
In response to the CBD鈥檚 previous Aichi targets, the percentage of the Earth鈥檚 surface covered by protected areas increased from 14.1 to 15.3 per cent on land and from 2.9 to 7.5 per cent in the marine environment between 2010 and 2019. The implementation of Target 3 could increase protected area coverage much further in the coming years.
According to COP15鈥檚 final agreement, the implementation of the Framework must follow a human rights-based approach, acknowledging the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment as recognized by the UN.聽
Here in Canada, the federal government only recently passed the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) Act, which recognizes and legally upholds the rights of Indigenous Peoples. The outcome of COP15, therefore, coincides with the national implementation of UNDRIP, informing the role that Indigenous rights will play in Canada鈥檚 conservation agenda.
Canada cannot meet its global commitments without centring Indigenous leadership and working in collaboration with Indigenous peoples.聽
This can be achieved by following the recommendations of the Indigenous Circle of Experts to provide continued 鈥� and increased 鈥� support for Indigenous-led conservation initiatives, like IPCAs. Supporting Indigenous-led conservation can help improve biodiversity outcomes while upholding our responsibility to human rights and reconciliation.
___
Noella Gray receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC).
Victoria Hodson receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC).聽
___
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Disclosure information is available on the original site. Read the original article:聽
https://theconversation.com/cop15s-global-biodiversity-framework-must-advance-indigenous-led-conservation-to-halt-biodiversity-loss-by-2030-195188
Noella Gray, Associate Professor of Geography, University of Guelph and Victoria Hodson, PhD Student, University of Guelph, The Conversation
