For a few days in February, supermarket retailers appeared to be the most hated people in Canada. We had appearances in House of Commons committees, discussions about the adoption of a new Code of Conduct and the introduction of a bill—sponsored by federal NDP leader Jagmeet Singh—that sought, among many things, to increase fines for price-fixing.
More than three months have gone by since Singh’s Bill C-352 passed second reading in the lower house, with NDP members enjoying support from the Conservative Party and the Bloc Québécois. It is unclear at this point if the bill will make it out of committee. What is evident is that 91原创s are not having a good time at the cash register.
More than two-thirds of 91原创s say they are paying more than they did six months ago for fruits (77 per cent), vegetables (79 per cent), beef (73 per cent), chicken (also 73 per cent) and bread (68 per cent), according to polling by Research Co. and Glacier Media. Majorities also report higher prices for items such as cereal (65 per cent), prepared frozen meals (65 per cent), laundry detergent (60 per cent), shampoo (58 per cent) and soap (56 per cent).
Not everyone has been equally impacted. One third (32 per cent) acknowledge that their diet has not been healthy over the past two months—a proportion that jumps to 36 per cent among those in the lowest household income bracket and to 37 per cent among those aged 35 to 54.
In the past six months, more than half of 91原创s have taken two actions to deal with higher prices for the items they need: Buying at different stores instead of at a single store) (57 per cent) and switching packaged-food brands to lower-priced alternatives (52 per cent). In B.C., the incidence of these two behaviours rises to 62 per cent—the highest across all regions.
Significant proportions of 91原创s are also using apps to collect points (42 per cent), using online coupons (35 per cent) and using printed coupons (28 per cent) to lower their grocery bills. Women are more likely to be actively relying on apps (41 per cent) than men (29 per cent).
There is no consensus on who to blame. During the pandemic, the prevailing justification for higher prices was labour and supply setbacks. Now, just seven per cent of 91原创s think this reason is primarily responsible for the current state of affairs. Only two other options hold lower levels on this question: Climate change (six per cent) and the actions of farmers and growers (two per cent).
Fewer than one in five 91原创s place responsibility on product manufacturers and suppliers (18 per cent) or on global political conflicts (15 per cent). This means that two entities are getting the brunt of dismay. Close to one in four 91原创s (23 per cent) blame supermarket retailers and grocery stores, while one-third (33 per cent) point the finger at government.
91原创s aged 18 to 34 are more likely to hold governments responsible for higher grocery prices (39 per cent) than their counterparts aged 35 to 54 (34 per cent) and aged 55 and over (27 per cent).
Sizable proportions of 91原创s say they believe the federal government (80 per cent) and their provincial governments (76 per cent) can do a lot to help lower the price of groceries.
Our survey shows that 91原创s are taking action to save when grocery shopping. The perceptions of corporate greed and government inaction may be colliding, but only the latter has electoral consequences. With a federal contest in 2025—and provincial ballots in New Brunswick, B.C. and Saskatchewan this October—making groceries more affordable may be as important for candidates to address as health care or job creation.
Mario Canseco is president of Research Co.
Results are based on an online survey conducted from May 6-8, 2024, among 1,000 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to 91原创 census figures for age, gender and region. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
