Acura has brought the enthusiast favorite nameplate back to the market after a two-decade hiatus. It now takes the form of a hatchback sedan rather than the hatchback coupe most people might remember. It offers roomy seating, standard turbocharged power and many helpful driver assistance features.
The with its optional turbocharged engine brings up similar fuzzy memories of the late 2000s Mazdaspeed 3, albeit with a more refined demeanor. Both cars promise driving fun at a somewhat reasonable price. Which one does it better? Edmunds compared them to find out.
INTERIOR AND TECHNOLOGY
The Integra鈥檚 interior might give you d茅j脿 vu if you鈥檙e familiar with the latest Honda Civic. There鈥檚 a clear familial resemblance to the Honda Civic Si, which it shares a number of its parts with. The honeycomb vents are similar as is the protruding screen rising above the dash. That鈥檚 not necessarily a bad thing since the Civic is one of the best in its class. The Integra is packed with standard features such as interior ambient lighting, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, adaptive cruise control, a blind-spot warning system, and more. Opting for the A-Spec trim adds more features and gives you the option for a manual transmission.
On the inside, there isn鈥檛 much to distinguish the Mazda 3 Turbo from a basic Mazda 3. Still, the materials look and feel upscale, and the design is a masterclass in simplicity and intuitiveness. The controls are easy to use and find, helping you keep your eyes on the road. Technology features are similarly abundant too. As a hatchback, however, the Mazda 3 Turbo goes for style more than versatility. It trails the Integra in cargo space, and second-row passengers may feel a bit cramped in the Mazda.
Winner: Integra
POWER AND PERFORMANCE
The Integra shares not only its look with its fun-loving cousin, the Honda Civic Si, but also its turbocharged 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine. It produces 200 horsepower and 192 lb-ft of torque. Front-wheel drive is standard. In Edmunds鈥� testing, the 2023 Integra with the available manual transmission accelerated from 0 to 60 mph in an unremarkable 7.8 seconds. The Integra feels sharp around turns, but you鈥檒l want to opt for summer-rated tires to make the most of its available grip.
The Mazda is noticeably snappier in a straight line. It did the same sprint in 6.1 seconds, leaving the Acura in the dust. The turbocharged 2.5-liter engine puts out 227 horsepower and 310 lb-ft, or 250 horsepower and 320 lb-ft if you use premium 93 octane gas. Mazda also fits it with all-wheel drive, which is a nice bonus during wintery conditions. The Mazda 3鈥瞫 handling isn鈥檛 quite as satisfying as the Integra鈥檚, but otherwise, it鈥檚 an easy win here.
Winner: Mazda 3 Turbo
FUEL EFFICIENCY
In Edmunds鈥� real-world testing, the manual-transmission Integra returned 30.2 mpg, which is slightly higher than the EPA-estimated 30 mpg combined. When the Integra is equipped with the continuously variable transmission, or CVT, the combined EPA rating pops up to 33 mpg.
Fuel economy isn鈥檛 the Mazda 3 Turbo鈥檚 strong suit, as it has an EPA-estimated 26 mpg in mixed driving. Edmunds hasn鈥檛 tested the fuel economy on this engine, but owners are reporting a slightly better average of 27.5 mpg.
Winner: Integra
FEATURES AND VALUE
Starting at $31,895 with destination, even base Integras are flush with features such as imitation leather upholstery, a power-adjustable driver鈥檚 seat and heated front seats. However, if you want the more engaging manual transmission, it is only available on the top trim, which costs $36,895. And perhaps the Integra鈥檚 biggest value issue is that, if you鈥檙e willing to trade off a bit of cargo space, the Honda Civic Si gets you 80% of that experience for about $7,000 less.
The Mazda 3 Turbo has a higher starting price of $33,515. But you鈥檙e getting a few more features than what the base Integra has, including all-wheel drive and a premium sound system. The Mazda 3 Turbo is only available with a six-speed automatic transmission, which our editors prefer to the Integra鈥檚 CVT. It tops out at $36,960, but includes a 360-degree camera and a few cosmetic exterior items to make it stand out from other Mazda 3s. You get more for your money in the Mazda 3 Turbo, which ultimately gives it the win.
Winner: Mazda 3 Turbo
EDMUNDS SAYS:
It was a close race between both vehicles, and while the Integra is fun to drive, it doesn鈥檛 quite distinguish itself over vehicles in this price range. The Mazda 3 Turbo, on the other hand, punches above its weight and wins out with its pleasing performance and value.
_______
This story was provided to by the automotive website .
Kristin Shaw is a freelance writer at Edmunds and is on .
Kristin Shaw, The Associated Press
