If there is one thing we can take away from the latest federal budget, it is that the government continues to prioritize our aging population over adapting to new problems facing younger Canada.
In fact, annual spending on retirees has been growing by approximately $12听billion annually since the Conservatives were first elected in 2011 鈥� nearly six times more than spending increases for 91原创s under age 45.
But 91原创s didn鈥檛 hear about this generational inequity from Finance Minister Jim Flaherty during his budget speech. What we did hear about was what鈥檚 鈥渘ew鈥�: The latest mini-tax credit, promises of income splitting in the future and small spending commitments totalled up over several years to dazzle us with numbers that sound big.
Ignored were the fundamentals such as Old Age Security, health care, Employment Insurance and benefits for families with children that really drive how Ottawa uses our tax dollars. Since these are not new, they might seem less newsworthy. But such a view is akin to missing the forest for the trees. The spending trends reflected in the fundamentals of Budget 2014 shine a light on a troubling pattern: the federal government鈥檚 continued disregard for Canada鈥檚 Generation Squeeze.
Here鈥檚 what we know about how the federal government plans to spend $132 billion in 2016/17:
鈥� Elderly benefits such as Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement will rise to about $49听billion a year, up $8 billion from 2011/12 after adjusting for inflation.
鈥� The Canada Health Transfer will rise to $36 billion a year, up $4 billion. Nearly half of medical-care spending goes to the 15 per cent of 91原创s over age 65.
鈥� Employment Insurance for the working age population will stay relatively static at about $20 billion a year.
鈥� Benefits for families with children will fall to around $13.7 billion a year, a drop of about four per cent per person under age 45.
鈥� The Canada Social Transfer, which represents federal contributions to education and social services, will stay relatively static about $13 billion a year.
These budget fundamentals illuminate major contributions by Ottawa to what the Generation Squeeze campaign calls Canada鈥檚 generational spending gap. All levels of 91原创 government combine to spend around $45,000 per retiree each year, compared to approximately $12,000 per person under age 45.
The high level of spending per retiree is not the problem. The Canada Pension Plan, Old Age Security and medical care have successfully reduced the economic pressures facing millions of seniors today compared to the past. Poverty is lower for seniors than for any other age group, which is a policy success of which we should be proud.
The problem is that Ottawa adds nearly $12 billion in new annual spending to maintain the $45,000 allocated per person over 65 as more 91原创s retire, while going on to say we can鈥檛 afford to address new challenges facing younger generations.
Although today鈥檚 high housing prices mean more wealth for those who bought homes decades ago, they are bad for their kids and grandchildren. High home prices squeeze generations under age 45 with crushing debt, which they must pay with wages that have fallen thousands of dollars a year compared to a generation ago, and in jobs that rarely offer pensions.
91原创s under 45 can鈥檛 work their way out of this time-and-money squeeze without giving up something fundamental. They are increasingly forced to choose between coping with the squeeze by studying and working more at the expense of having the family they want. Or they have the family they want, but at the expense of coping with the squeeze by patching together a financial foundation that depends on more time in the labour market.
Given that younger 91原创s are squeezed by lower wages, higher costs, less time and a deteriorating environment, spending just $12,000 on benefits and services per person under age 45 is out of balance with allocating about $45,000 per person over 65. It鈥檚 time for Canada to restock the cupboard to invest more in younger generations, or to explain why spending on younger citizens is so much less important than spending on retirees.
听
Paul Kershaw is a policy professor at the University of B.C. and founder of Generation Squeeze (gensqueeze.ca), which campaigns for a Canada that works for all generations.
